[INDOLOGY] Why not HK?

[Giulio Geymonat]

Dear list members,
I refrained from this question since I've been following this very
interesting list (a couple of years) feeling that it wasn't the case to ask
such a banal question in such an high-profile list. But today I dare to ask
you very knowledgeable people (I really learned a lot of things since I am
following this list and I am really grateful to all who wrote on the many
interesting points tackled), why don't you use Harvard-Kyoto?
It would be so much easier for me to follow what interests me the most in
all this (and what I might have a chance to contribute in -- a very slight
chance indeed, to be frank), that is your interpretations of sanskrit
passages.
I have no problem in reading Gretil Titus all the dictionary the
mahAbhArata etc. but your passages come to me full of question marks: I
know it's me who must be like a troglodite of fonts, but it is also that I
love Harvard-Kyoto and I don't understand what can be found wrong with it.
Do you find something wrong with HK? And if not, why don't you use it in
the emails?
Thank you,
Giulio Geymonat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20250304/775df748/attachment.htm>