[INDOLOGY] List of paninian equivalents of western grammatical terms for sanskrit

Satyanad Kichenassamy satyanad.kichenassamy at univ-reims.fr
Sat Sep 7 17:15:27 UTC 2024


Dear All,

Indeed, as Jan pointed out, trying to avoid Sanskrit terms and 
concepts,  usually without adequate discussion, or the creation of new 
terms or concepts, is an unfortunate phenomenon.

Those who are interested in an explanation on simple examples of how 
Paninean grammar actually works may also want to look up:

Pierre-Sylvain Filliozat, "Grammaire sanscrite pâninéenne", Paris: 
Picard, 1988.

This book does not seem to be available electronically.

Grammar as a (contemporary) science (as opposed to an art -- a tekhnè) 
owes much of its existence to Sanskrit. Frédérique Ildefonse argues that 
the technical study of language in Greek as a discipline emerged rather 
late, and without unification of its various components -- now viewed as 
subdisciplines of grammar -- because the study of language was taken 
over by philosophy (/La naissance de la grammaire //dans l'Antiquité 
grecque, /Paris: Vrin, 1997).

Actually, what seems to be referred to here as "Western" grammar, as 
completely unrelated to "Paninean grammar" should be defined. The 
grammars we use for European languages were heavily influenced by the 
discovery of Sanskrit grammar and the ensuing developement of IE 
studies. This is apparent when reading many twentieth-century Greek and 
Latin grammars. I would recommend avoiding the word "Western" in this 
context, or many others for that matter, if one wants to be precise. 
When we speak of "tone sa.mdhi" in Chinese, is this phrase 
understandable in terms of a putative "Western grammar" that would not 
include borrowings from Sanskrit?

Best,

     Satyanad Kichenassamy

Le 05/09/2024 à 15:50, Jan E.M. Houben via INDOLOGY a écrit :
> Dear Andrew,
> this is a nice list of approximate equivalents or equivalents under certain
> conditions.
> The list is misleading (in both directions) if the =- signs are taken too
> literally.
> As the list is attached to an online grammar the user should be able to
> find out that a word ending in dvitīyā may have other functions than the
> 'accusative' and the 'accusative' may be expressed by other vibhaktis than
> the second (cp. in classical Sanskrit yaj 'sacrifice' in the sentence
> indram ajena yajati "to Indra he sacrifices a goat"). And the (partial)
> equivalence only works if 'accusative' is taken as a flat indication of a
> case ending, forgetting the conceptual basis of the term 'accusative'. Nor
> is ṣaṣṭhī simply the 'genitive', etc.  (Mutatis mutandis this applies to
> terms such as 'optative' etc.).
> Among printed Sanskrit grammars for students I believe that
> Devavāṇīpraveśikā
> <https://sanskritstudio.wordpress.com/2012/11/14/review-of-devavanipravesika-by-robert-p-goldman/#:~:text=Sutherland%20Goldman%20is%20a%20typical,serve%20as%20a%20reference%20book.>
> by
> Goldman & Goldman is one of the first to give *again* Sanskrit grammatical
> terms for Sanskrit students at the introductory level.
> *again*: Historically, introductions to Sanskrit since the nineteenth
> century are rather characterized by gradually filtering out Sanskrit
> grammatical terms (compare Max Mueller's 1870 *Sanskrit grammar for
> beginners* with the "New and abridged edition" of Max Mueller's grammar
> prepared by Macdonell and published in 1886). R G Bhandarkar in his  *First
> Book of Sanskrit* and *Second Book of Sanskrit *(from 1860s) tried to adopt
> "the terminology of the English Grammarians of Sanskrit" while "strictly
> following Panini, as explained by Bhattoji Dikshita in his
> Siddhantakaumudi" (unfortunately without giving a concordance of English
> and Sanskrit grammatical terms).
>
> Best,
> Jan Houben
>
> On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 09:28, Andrew Ollett via INDOLOGY <
> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>
>> It is in no way complete/comprehensive, but I have a list here:
>>
>> http://prakrit.info/vrddhi/grammar/#glossary
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 3:20 AM rajam via INDOLOGY <
>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m also interested in this endeavor.
>>>
>>> I’d like to have a Standard / most used / most needed list of Western
>>> Grammatical terms, so I can provide Tolkappiyan (tolkāppiyan) equivalents
>>> from the South for interested scholars.
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> rajam
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 3, 2024, at 9:58 PM, Harry Spier via INDOLOGY <
>>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>>> Dear list members,
>>>> Have any members made a list of western grammatical terms and their
>>> paninian equivalents (preferably a searchable word document).  Abhyankar's
>>> Dictionary of Sanskrit Grammar is good for getting the western grammatical
>>> terms, when you know the Paninian  term, but I need a list going the other
>>> way , where given a western sanskrit grammatical term such as for example:
>>> "accusative, gerund, gerundive, optative" etc. etc. you can find the
>>> equivalent paninian term .
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Harry Spier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>>>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

-- 
**********************************************
Satyanad KICHENASSAMY
Professor of Mathematics
Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Reims  (CNRS, UMR9008)
     and GREI (EPHE-Paris and Sorbonne-Université)
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
F-51687 Reims Cedex 2
France
Web:https://www.normalesup.org/~kichenassamy
**********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20240907/45795908/attachment.htm>


More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list