[INDOLOGY] CORRECTION: List of paninian equivalents of western grammatical terms for sanskrit

[Harry Spier]

I meant to write:

Jan Houben wrote:
Historically, introductions to Sanskrit since the nineteenth century are
rather characterized by gradually filtering out Sanskrit grammatical terms

and
Hans Hock wrote:

> , as long as we don’t expect anything more than corresponding terms for
> case marking there should be no problem
>

Looking at the table of contents to Apte's "Student's Guide to Sanskrit
Composition (third edition 1890)"  only western grammatical terms are used.
Does that mean that the grammar of sanskrit sentences can be correctly
described using western grammatical terms, but it's just that those western
grammatical terms don't correspond to Indian grammatical terms for sanskrit.

Link to the ninth edition (reprint of third edition?)
https://archive.org/download/StudentsGuideToSanskritComposition-VsApte1925/StudentsGuideToSanskritComposition-VsApte1925.pdf

Harry Spier
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20240905/db864242/attachment.htm>