[INDOLOGY] help with a name
ptra at LOC.GOV
Fri Feb 28 09:09:51 UTC 2020
In the Library of Congress database, the heading (or access point) for Har Dayal had been entered in inverted order, as “Dayal, Har”. This was a legacy practice that is no longer in accordance with current cataloging practice for Indic names. We have now re-evaluated the heading and revised our records as following:
Main entry: Har Dayal, Lala, 1884-1939
Variant forms: Dayal, Har, 1884-1939
Dayal, Har, Lala, 1884-1939
Haradiāla, Lala, 1884-1939
Hardayal, Lala, 1884-1939
Har Dayal Singh Mathur, Lala, 1884-1939
Mathur, Har Dayal Singh, Lala, 1884-1939
FYI, we are treating “Lala” as an honorific.
Thanks and regards,
Library of Congress Office
New Delhi, India
ptra at loc.gov<mailto:ptra at loc.gov>
From: INDOLOGY [mailto:indology-bounces at list.indology.info] On Behalf Of Jonathan Silk via INDOLOGY
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 14:59
To: Indology <indology at list.indology.info>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] help with a name
A colleague asked me a question that, rather than rush an answer, has made me turn to your collective wisdom.
I have been rather pedantic that Lokesh Chandra is one name, and thus not to be cited as Chandra, Lokesh. OK, I think this is completely correct (ditto for his father Ragu Vira, not Vira, Ragu).
My colleague however has asked me about Har Dayal. Wikipedia tells me that his name is Lala Har Dayal Singh Mathur. OK, but in English at least he published under Har Dayal, so my colleague's question is whether the "family name" is Dayal, or Har Dayal, or as I interpret the question, whether we should put reference in a bibliography as Dayal, Har, or rather Har Dayal.
Thank you for enlightening the ignorant!
Leiden University Institute for Area Studies, LIAS
Matthias de Vrieshof 3, Room 0.05b
2311 BZ Leiden
copies of my publications may be found at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the INDOLOGY