[INDOLOGY] Extension of Sanskrit Heritage tools with connection to Amba Kulkarni's parser

Peter Scharf scharfpm7 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 19 07:03:44 UTC 2019

I checked the declension of *adas* and sarva (f.) on the Sanskrit Heritage
site by going to the dictionary and clicking on the gender identifier.  The
paradigms are correct.  What do you find incorrect and where?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:47 PM Walter Slaje via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:

> Certainly a welcome development, but
> > this wonderful grammatical analysis
> really calls for a thorough revision before activating it. The very few
> searches I could make yielded inexplicable, in parts unbelievably wrong
> results. Anyone may see for themselves if they just test the declension of
> "adas", "idam", "ubhaya" (displaying dual forms, but no fem.), "sarvā"
> (fem.), "dos / doṣan", "anaḍuh", "asthi", and many more. In the hands of
> Sanskrit beginners who lack grammatical training this database will do
> more harm than good. I can only warn against its use until it has seen a
> very careful revision by experts.
> Kind regards,
> WS
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)

Peter M. Scharf
scharfpm7 at g <peter.scharf at univ-paris-diderot.fr>mail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20190119/aca13221/attachment.htm>

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list