Certainly a welcome development, but
>
this wonderful grammatical analysis
really calls for a thorough revision before activating it. The very few searches I could make yielded inexplicable, in parts unbelievably wrong results. Anyone may see for themselves if they just test the declension of "adas", "idam", "ubhaya" (displaying dual forms, but no fem.), "sarvā" (fem.), "dos / doṣan", "anaḍuh", "asthi", and many more. In the hands of Sanskrit beginners who lack grammatical training this database
will do more harm than good. I can only warn against its use until it has seen a very careful revision by experts.
Kind regards,
WS