Re: [INDOLOGY] Yama/niyama in PÄ Å›upata and Yoga
Dr. T. Ganesan
ganesan at ifpindia.org
Wed Apr 27 05:49:27 UTC 2016
On 26-04-2016 21:53, Rafal Kleczek wrote:
> T/he īśvāra-praṇidhāna of the PYŚ, for example, often takes on a more
> sectarian flavor in the later texts, such as //śaṅkara-pūjanaṃ in the
> //Śivayogadīpikā//. ///
Sankarapuujanam need be taken to be 'a sectarian flavour'. For, Isvara
denotes only Siva as we find in all the Upanishads and other texts;
Svetasvataropanishad repeats this word many times and it can not be
interpreted in other ways.
As Kalidasa says in the invocatory verse of his drama, Vikramorvasiyam,
vedānteṣu yamāhurekapuruṣaṃvyāpya sthitaṃrodasī /
yasminnīśvara ityananyaviṣayaḥśabdo yathārthākṣaraḥ/
Isvara denotes only Siva from the early period. Kalidasa is of the firm
view that the entire Vedanta corpus (vedānteṣu) proclaims Siva to be the
highest Reality (puruṣa) that pervades all the universe. Kalidasa and
Patanjali definitely belong to very early period. Thus by
īśvāra-praṇidhāna it is fully plausible and also possible, that
Patanjali meant only worship of Siva. And, worshipping a supreme God
need not be interpreted as ''sectarian''. One cannot ''worship'' a
supreme reality which is nirguna.
Ganesan
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20160427/1758d6d7/attachment.htm>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list