[INDOLOGY] INDOLOGY Digest, Vol 23, Issue 18

[Dr. Rupali Mokashi]

I need Katyayan Srauta sutra by H G Ranade.
Rupali Mokashi
On 26-Dec-2014 10:30 pm, <indology-request at list.indology.info> wrote:

> Send INDOLOGY mailing list submissions to
>         indology at list.indology.info
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology_list.indology.info
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         indology-request at list.indology.info
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         indology-owner at list.indology.info
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of INDOLOGY digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Traditional/ insider's view of language or dialect    status
>       of Prakrits. IMPROVED TEXT (Ashok Aklujkar)
>    2. Re: Traditional/ insider's view of language or    dialect status
>       of Prakrits (Hock, Hans Henrich)
>    3. Re: Traditional/ insider's view of language or dialect status
>       of Prakrits (Nagaraj Paturi)
>    4. Dharm?nubandhi?lokacaturda?? (Rohana Seneviratne)
>    5. Fwd:  Dharm?nubandhi?lokacaturda?? (Madhav Deshpande)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 10:21:23 -0800
> From: Ashok Aklujkar <ashok.aklujkar at gmail.com>
> To: Indology List <indology at list.indology.info>
> Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Traditional/ insider's view of language or
>         dialect status of Prakrits. IMPROVED TEXT
> Message-ID: <DD2DEB43-1D1F-440A-A68B-44C1146D56E1 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> The message somehow left my computer as I was changing parts of it. There
> seems to be a problem with the most recent version of Apple?s Mail program.
> If one is changing a draft selected for sending with the ?Check grammar
> with spelling? tool or making changes manually one by one, the draft is
> sent even after only a part of the changes are made. It is not held back
> for more changes or for another activation of the ?send? command. Anyway,
> my intended text was:
>
> As far as I could ascertain, there is no word meaning ?dialect? in
> pre-modern Sanskrit. In ancient and medieval India, the way of looking at
> linguistic variation and handling it must have been different, at a
> fundamental level, from the way to which we are now accustomed. In my view,
> therefore, the questions we should ask before we try to answer the
> important questions Prof. Paturi has asked should be: (a) Where exactly the
> difference lay? (b) How did the difference come about? What were its
> historical causes?
>
> I do not have answers to these questions, at least not answers that can be
> put forward for discussion, but the following article by Dr. Eivind Kahrs
> could be taken as a starting point:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                                                                   Kahrs,
> Eivind G(eroge). 1992. "What is a tad-bhava word?? Indo-Iranian Journal
> 35:225-249.
>
> a.a.
> .
> > On Dec 24, 2014, at 12:55 AM, Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com
> <mailto:nagarajpaturi at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > When did the convention of treating Prakrits as 'languages' and not as
> dialects begin?
> >
> > Was there such an attitude of 'languages' not 'dialects' towards
> Prakrits in Sanskrit or Prakrit sources of the ancient or medieval period?
> >
> > Is there a work dealing with this issue?
>
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20141226/0674e692/attachment.htm>