Unattested Tibetan phrase

Matthew Kapstein mkapstei at MIDWAY.UCHICAGO.EDU
Tue May 25 03:52:20 UTC 2004

I tend to think that caNkrama(-patha/-mArga) is much more likely.
Possibly also pradak.si.na-patha. As the orthography of 'drul in Tibetan
is brda rnying, if this is occurring in old (8th or early 9th c.)
translations, then either of these would be plausible.

Matthew Kapstein
Numata Professor of Buddhist Studies
The Divinity School of the University of Chicago

Directeur d'études
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list