upasargavazena dhaatvarthavipari.naamaat

[Elliot Stern]

In the passage referred to by Madhav Deshpande, kau.n.dabha.t.ta.h cites
only two verses from tantravaartikam to miimaa.msaasuutram 1.3.33
(Anandashrama SS edition, 1970 A,D. reprint, 250.10-13). The
vaiyaakara.nabhuu.sa.nasaara.h passage in question reads (as edited by
Balakrsna Pancholi, in Kashi Sanskrit Series 188; Varanasi, 1969 printing;
377.3-378.2):

ukta.m caak.rtyadhikara.navaarttike
        caturvidhe pade caatra dvividhasyaarthanir.naya.h /
        kriyate sa.mzayotpatternopasarganipaatayo.h //
        tayorarthaabhidhaane hi vyaapaaro naiva vidyate /
        yadarthadyotakau tau tu vaacaka.h sa vicaaryate // iti //.

        upasarge.na dhatvartho balaadanya.h pratiiyate /
        prahaaraahaaravihaaraparihaaravat // iti //
atropasargapada.m nipaatopalak.sa.nam / dhaatupada.m padaantarasyeti bodhyam //

As I read it, the first *iti* (after the second verse) ends the domain of
*ukta.m caak.rtyadhikara.navaarttike*. The third verse is introduced
without ascription, and followed by a brief comment.

It should further be noted that sthiramati.h, the author of the
madhyaantavibhaaga.tiikaa, seems to have lived in the 6th century A.D.,
while kumaarila.h evidently was active in the first half of the 7th century
A.D.

That said, it seems clear that the verse is not kumaarila's.

Elliot Stern


>The verse that I have come across in the grammatical literature has a
>slightly different reading:
>        upasarge.na dhaatvartho balaad anya.h pratiiyate /
>        prahaaraahaarasa.mhaaravihaaraparihaaravat //
>The reference in front of me is from Kau.n.dabha.t.ta's Vaiyaakara.na-
>bhuu.sa.nasaara (Nipaataarthanir.naya section), edited by Tarakeshwar
>Shastri Chaturvedi, Adarsha Granthamala, No. 2, Varanasi, 1965, p. 377.
>Here, this verse is among the verses introduced with the comment: ukta.m
>caak.rtyadhikara.navaarttike.  This must be Tantravaarttika of Kumaarila
>on Miimaa.msaasuutra 1.3.33 (aak.rtis tu kriyaarthatvaat).  Check the
>Anandrashrama edition of MS (with bhaazya and vaarttika), Pt. I, pp.
>302ff.  I have this reference from one of my own earlier publications, and
>I don't have that volume at hand at the moment.
>
>                                Madhav Deshpande
>
>On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Jae-sung Kim (Jung Won) wrote:
>
>> Dear Indology Listmembers:
>>
>> Does anyone know another locations of following zloka,  especially the
>> locations in the vyakaara.na literatures.
>>
>>         upasarge.na dhaatvartho balaad anyatra niiyate /
>>         ga.ggaasalilamaadhurya.m saagare.na yathaambhasaa //
>>
>> I already know this zloka is in the  MadhyaantavibhaagaTikaa (Pandeya ed.
>> p. 5).
>>
>> The context is following.
>>
>> [p.5]
>> etir gatyartha.h / prati.h praaptyartha.h /upasargavazena
>>dhaatvarthavipari.naamaat /
>>
>>         upasarge.na dhaatvartho balaad anyatra niiyate /
>>         ga.ggaasalilamaadhurya.m saagare.na yathaambhasaa //
>>
>> pratiitya zabdo'tra lyabanta.h praaptaavapek.saayaa.m vartate /
>> samutpuurva.h padi.h praadurbhaavaartha iti samutpaada.cabda.h
>>praadurbhaave vartate /
>>
>>  Muulamadhyamakaarikaas (Madhyamikasuutras) de Naagaarjuna avec la
>>Prasannapadaa
>>  Commentaire de Candrakiirti,  ed. by de la Valee Poussin,Bibliotheca
>>Buddhica 4.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>  $B!y!y!y (B
>> KIM Jae-sung
>> Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies
>> University of Tokyo
>> e-mail : jungwon at l.u-tokyo.ac.jp
>>


Elliot M. Stern
552 South 48th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029
USA

telephone: 215 747 6204