[INDOLOGY] The Ḍākinījālasaṃvarārṇava tantra?

David and Nancy Reigle dnreigle at gmail.com
Mon Sep 30 06:11:47 UTC 2024


Dear Westin,

The *Sarvabuddhasamāyogaḍākinījālaśaṃvara* described by Szántó,
Péter-Dániel, & Arlo Griffiths was published in 2022 as
*Śrīsarvabuddhasamāyogaḍākinījālasaṃvaranāmatantram*, edited by Thakur Sain
Negi, in the Rare Buddhist Texts Series, no. 36, Central Institute of
Higher Tibetan Studies, Sarnath, Varanasi. You expressed doubt as to
whether this is the text you are seeking. Now you can verify this, one way
or the other.

Best regards,

David Reigle
Colorado, U.S.A.

On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 5:41 PM Westin Harris via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:

> Dear Indologists,
>
> *Bee*: Thank you. This sounds interesting. I will definitely follow up on
> this.
>
> *Asko*: Thank you. Indeed, I had consulted the Szanto entry in the
> Brill's Encyclopedia, but the Dwivedi/Samdhong Rinpoche source is new to
> me. Thanks for that! However, I have a strong doubt that the
> ḌākinījālasaṃvarĀRṆAVA (DJSA) text cited in my Vajravārāhī/-yoginī sources
> is identical to the (Sarvabuddhasamāyoga-)Ḍākinījālaśaṃvaratantra (DJS) as
> surveyed by Szanto, et al.
>
> As I understand it, the DJS, proper, is an early "proto-yoginītantra," so
> it strikes me as unlikely that the Six Vārāhi Scriptures/dPyal Threefold
> Vārāhī traditions would reference it as a source text. It seems more likely
> that the DJSA they reference is a later (real or imagined) yoginī tantra or
> uttaratantra akin to the Ḍākārṇava.
>
> As I mentioned in my first post, I also suspect (but cannot say for
> certain) that the Ḍākinījālasaṃvarārṇava referenced in my Vārāhī/yoginī
> texts might be the same as the Saṃvarārṇava mentioned in Sugiki and
> English. Sugiki hypothesizes that the Saṃvarārṇava is an imaginary text,
> but the fact that the (Ḍākinījāla)Saṃvarārṇava is cited relatively
> frequently as a source text for Vārāhī/yoginī material makes me wonder if
> it might be (or have been) a real text.
>
> With all these concealed mysteries, it's no wonder they named the cycle
> "saṃvara" hahaha.
>
>
> *Sincerely,*
>
> *Westin Harris*
> Ph.D. Candidate
> Study of Religion
> University of California, Davis
> https://religionsgrad.ucdavis.edu/people/westin-harris
> <https://religions.ucdavis.edu/people/westin-harris>
>
> 2021 Dissertation Fellow,
> The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Program in Buddhist Studies
>
> Sarva Mangalam.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 5:03 AM Asko Parpola <aparpola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Westin,
>>
>> Could these references be of any help?
>>
>> Rinpoche, Samdhong, & Vrajvallabh Dwivedi (eds.) 1990.
>> Ḍākinījālasaṃvararahasyam by Anaṅgayogī.  (Rare Buddhist Text Series, 8.)
>> Sarnath, Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies. xii, 20 pp.
>>
>>
>> Szántó, Péter-Dániel, & Arlo Griffiths 2015.
>> Sarvabuddhasamāyogaḍākinījālaśaṃvara. Pp. 367-372 in Jonathan A. Silk,
>> Oskar von Hinüber, and Vincent Eltschinger (eds.), Brill’s Encyclopedia of
>> Buddhism, volume 1: Literature and languages. (Handbook of Oriental
>> Studies, Section two: India, vol. 29: 1.) . Leiden: Brill.
>>
>>
>> Best wishes, Asko
>>
>> On 29. Sep 2024, at 4.24, Westin Harris via INDOLOGY <
>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings Indologists,
>>
>> I am currently working on some Sanskrit and Tibetan material associated
>> with the Six [Vajra]vārāhī Scriptures (phag mo gzhung drug) and the
>> Threefold Vārāhī Cycle of the Chel Tradition (dPyal lugs phag mo skor
>> gsum). Many of the texts associate themselves with one
>> *Ḍākiṇī-jāla-saṃvar-ārṇava-tantra (mkha' 'gro drwa ba sdom pa rgya mtsho'i
>> rgyud).
>>
>> Can anyone tell me more about this (attested or imagined) source text?
>> Perhaps it is one and the same as the (equally enigmatic) Saṃvarārṇava?
>>
>> In her opus on Vajrayoginī, English (pp. 17, 52) mentions two brief
>> references to the Saṃvarārṇavatantra among her Vajrayoginī/Vajravārāhī
>> sources, but without any further elaboration. Moreover, in his CE of Chp.
>> 15 of the Ḍākārṇavatantra, Sugiki (p. 3n1) notes the mention of six Arṇava
>> texts (including Saṃvarārṇava) in a colophon to the Ḍākārṇava. However, he
>> says, "Most likely, the Six Oceans are imaginary root scriptures."
>>
>> Besides these two references (English and Sugiki), can anyone point me
>> towards more leads regarding the *Ḍākiṇījālasaṃvarārṇava / Saṃvarārṇava?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> *Sincerely,*
>>
>> *Westin Harris*
>> Ph.D. Candidate
>> Study of Religion
>> University of California, Davis
>> https://religionsgrad.ucdavis.edu/people/westin-harris
>> <https://religions.ucdavis.edu/people/westin-harris>
>>
>> 2021 Dissertation Fellow,
>> The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Program in Buddhist Studies
>>
>> Sarva Mangalam.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20240930/6c348862/attachment.htm>


More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list