[INDOLOGY] Non-standard sandhi

Krishnaprasad G krishnaprasadah.g at gmail.com
Wed Mar 20 02:55:34 UTC 2019


The double avagraha has 2 different methods followed by North Indian
textsand South Indian texts.
If anyone interested to know, I will write about double avagraha rules
followed.
KP


On Wed 20 Mar, 2019, 8:10 AM Elliot Stern via INDOLOGY, <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:

> The copper plate inscription (single) avagrahaḥ shows that even in the 9th
> century CE it could mark assimilation of at least ā + a. We cannot infer
> from this example, however, that double avagrahaḥ marking assimilation is
> an ancient usage. The only uses of double avagrahaḥ I’ve seen are in
> colonial period and later printed texts and in manuscripts copied from
> printed texts. These sources are not “quite old”.
>
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Harry Spier <hspier.muktabodha at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:49 PM Elliot Stern via INDOLOGY <
> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>
>> . Incidentally, the avagrahaḥ in the copper plate inscription is an
>> instance, in Whitney’s terminology, of a hyphen. The text reads:
>> vā’numodeta.
>>
>>
>> Does that mean the practice in some modern printed editions of using
> avagraha and double avagrahas to indicate the assimilations of a+a,  ā+ā,
> ā+a etc. is actually quite old?
>
> Harry Spier
>
>
> Elliot M. Stern
> 552 South 48th Street
> Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029
> emstern1948 at gmail.com
> 267-240-8418
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20190320/990722e5/attachment.htm>


More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list