[INDOLOGY] grammar question

[Nagaraj Paturi]

Are you talking about ekōnavimśati = ēka + ūna +  vimśati ? = 19

On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 11:16 PM François Patte via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:

> Bonjour,
>
> There is a construction ablative + na with numerals:
> ekān na viṃśatiḥ for 19
>
> Is this kind of construction exists in other circumstances? And, if yes,
> what is the meaning?
>
> I came accross this sentence:
>
> tena ṛṣabhān na prastāraḥ
>
> which comes as a conclusion after:
>
> tata ṛṣabhasya adhastāt ṣaḍjo deyatvenāsīt। sa copary agre vartate।
> (tena ṛṣabhān na prastāraḥ |)
>
> Thank you for some lights...
>
> --
> François Patte
> UFR de mathématiques et informatique
> Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
> Université Paris Descartes
> 45, rue des Saints Pères
> F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
> Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822
> http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>


-- 
Nagaraj Paturi

Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.


Director,  Inter-Gurukula-University Centre for Indic Knowledge Systems.
BoS, MIT School of Vedic Sciences, Pune, Maharashtra

BoS, Chinmaya Vishwavidyapeeth, Veliyanad, Kerala

Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies

FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,

(Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20190727/cd8c30df/attachment.htm>