Re: [INDOLOGY] Why there is no Padapāṭha for this mantra

[David and Nancy Reigle]

The other two recensions of the Ṛgveda saṃhitā that are now available in
print have bearing on this question, the Āśvalāyana śākhā and the Śāṃkhāyana
śākhā. Both of them give a padapāṭha for verse 7.59.12. What we do not know
is whether the padapāṭha for this verse was actually found in the 16
manuscripts of the Āśvalāyana padapāṭha used by B. B. Chaubey for his
edition, or in the 17 manuscripts of the Śāṃkhāyana padapāṭha used by Amal
Dhari Singh Gautam for his edition.

B. B. Chaubey says (p. 57) that he himself supplied the padapāṭha for the
212 verses of the Āśvalāyana śākhā that are not found in the Śākala śākhā,
since the Āśvalāyana padapāṭha manuscripts did not give them. He does not
say whether he also supplied the padapāṭha for verse 7.59.12 that is found
in the Śākala śākhā but there lacks a padapāṭha. As far as I could see,
Amal Dhari Singh Gautam does not say whether he himself supplied the
padapāṭha for any verses in his edition of the Śāṃkhāyana śākhā. We may
recall that Vishva Bandhu's edition of the Ṛgveda quietly supplies the
padapāṭha for the six verses of the Śākala śākhā that did not have it.

Best regards,

David Reigle
Colorado, U.S.A.

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 7:34 AM Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:

> Thanks, Johannes.  Best.
>
> Madhav
>
> Madhav M. Deshpande
> Professor Emeritus
> Sanskrit and Linguistics
> University of Michigan
> [Residence: Campbell, California]
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:23 PM Johannes Bronkhorst <
> johannes.bronkhorst at unil.ch> wrote:
>
>> The following article mentions the six verses of the Ṛgveda that have no
>> Padapāṭha (on p. 44):
>>
>> Kashikar, C. G. (1951): "The problem of the gaḷantas in the
>> Ṛgveda-Padapāṭha." *Proceedings of the All-India Oriental Conference* 13
>> (1946), 39-46.
>>
>> Commenting on this, I wrote in 1981 (p. 87): "This is most easily
>> explained by the assumption that these verses were not considered part of
>> the Ṛgveda by Śākalya. It further shows that the final redactors did not
>> hesitate to deviate from the composer of the Padapāṭha in deciding what
>> did, and what did not, belong to the Ṛgveda. (It is interesting to note
>> that at least one hymn of the Ṛgveda (10.95) is known to have had fewer
>> verses than at present at as late a date as that of the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa.
>> See Oldenberg, 1912: 303.)"
>>
>> "The orthoepic diaskeuasis of the Ṛgveda and the date of Pāṇini." *Indo-Iranian
>> Journal* 23 (1981), pp. 83-95.
>>
>> http://my.unil.ch/serval/document/BIB_F9751BB34E62.pdf
>>
>> with a reference to:
>>
>> Oldenberg, Hermann (1912): *Ṛgveda. Textkritische und exegetische Noten*.
>> Siebentes bis Zehntes Buch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
>>
>> Johannes Bronkhorst
>>
>> On 23 Sep 2018, at 06:05, Madhav Deshpande via INDOLOGY <
>> indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
>>
>> RV 7.59.12 त्र्यम्बकं यजामहे सुगन्धि पुष्टिवर्धनम्। उर्वारुकमिव
>> बन्धनान्मृत्योर्मुक्षीय माऽमृतात्। does not have a Padapāṭha.  This is not
>> a repeated mantra in the RV Saṃhitā.  What might be the reason why this
>> mantra does not have a Padapāṭha?  Is it likely that there were a few
>> post-Padapāṭha additions to the RV Saṃhitā?  Someone asked this question on
>> another discussion group.
>>
>> Madhav M. Deshpande
>> Professor Emeritus
>> Sanskrit and Linguistics
>> University of Michigan
>> [Residence: Campbell, California]
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>> committee)
>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
>> unsubscribe)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20180924/1af7ea32/attachment.htm>