[INDOLOGY] Draupadii and polyandry
Joydeep
jbagchee at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 23:08:32 UTC 2018
Dear Harry,
For a clarification of Witzel’s views as a textual critic, see *Philology
and Criticism*, Conclusion: Textual Criticism and Indology. The entire file
is available here: https://www.academia.edu/36999444/Philology_and_Criticism.
On the attempted stratification of the BhG (and Artur’s reference to
“earlier strata”) see “Paradigm Lost: The Application of the
Historical-Critical Method to the Bhagavadgītā,” available here:
https://www.academia.edu/30431442/Paradigm_Lost. See especially the table
on pp. 259–61.
Best,
Joydeep
Dr. Joydeep Bagchee
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Academia.edu Homepage <https://fu-berlin.academia.edu/JoydeepBagchee>
The Nay Science
<http://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-nay-science-9780199931361;jsessionid=94DFF6B197750DBE7C7E64A4FB8B28D2?cc=de&lang=en&>
Argument and Design
<http://www.brill.com/products/book/argument-and-design-unity-mahabharata>
Reading the Fifth Veda <http://www.brill.com/reading-fifth-veda>
When the Goddess Was a Woman <http://www.brill.com/when-goddess-was-woman>
Transcultural Encounters between Germany and India
<http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415844697/>
German Indology on OBO Hinduism
<http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195399318/obo-9780195399318-0147.xml>
___________________
What, then, is Philosophy?
Philosophy is the supremely precious.
Plotinus, Enneads I.III.5
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:24 PM Harry Spier <hspier.muktabodha at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:18 PM Joydeep via INDOLOGY
>
>> How are you identifying the “earlier strata” of the epic?
>>
>
> 1) I'd be interested if someone could point out the scholarly articles
> on relative dating of different parts of the Mahabharata.?
>
> 2) Could the techniques Michael Witzel pointed out years ago in this
> posting to relatively date the books or the Ramayana be used. I.e
> relative occurance of vai or similar words in vedic position 2 versus
> elsewhere. ?
>
> http://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology_list.indology.info/2000-March/020863.html
>
> 3) Could a similar technique be used with other linguistic
> characteristics.I.e. relative occurance of linguistic characteristics that
> are uncommon in vedic but common in classical sanskrit. Whitney noted use
> of passive constructions, participles instead of verbs, substitution of
> compounds for sentences as characteristic of the change from vedic to the
> classical language.
>
> Harry Spier
>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20181026/9458d4aa/attachment.htm>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list