[INDOLOGY] HTML definition of Unicode characters for r and l with "underring"?
wujastyk at gmail.com
Wed Jan 18 18:52:18 UTC 2017
r with dot below is defined as a combined glyph:
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1e5b/index.htm Similarly r +
But ring below is - as you observe correctly - not in the unicode standard
as a single glyph. See, e.g., this list
<http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/r.htm>. The letter r + ring
below is, as others have said, still fully achievable and fully Unicode,
but it has to be rendered with a combination of the two glyphs r and the
non-spacing ring below.
The canonical list of names from the Unicode website is here:
http://unicode.org/charts/charindex.html . Search for "ring below" to see
what is, and what isn't available.
Professor Dominik Wujastyk <http://ualberta.academia.edu/DominikWujastyk>
Singhmar Chair in Classical Indian Society and Polity
Department of History and Classics <http://historyandclassics.ualberta.ca/>
University of Alberta, Canada
South Asia at the U of A:
On 16 January 2017 at 08:22, Gruenendahl, Reinhold via INDOLOGY <
indology at list.indology.info> wrote:
> Dear list members,
> I would be much obliged for any information concerning the current HTML
> definitions for (vocalic) r, R, l, and L, long and short, with underring
> (not underdot).
> The definitions I found some years ago (e.g., for R-underring and
>  for r-underring) do not seem to be valid anymore.
> I have searched Alan Wood's site, but in vain.
> Thanks in advance
> Reinhold Grünendahl
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the INDOLOGY