[INDOLOGY] Correct reading in Taittiriya Samhita edition?

[Harry Spier]

Dear list members,
Three editions of the Taitttiriya Samhita, the edition of Weber, the
edition of Satvalekar, and the edition of Kasinatha Agase differ in a
reading.

In the Taittiriya Samhita 4.5.1 verse 2

D


Satvalekar has      sarvān jambhayantsarvāśca

Agase   has           sarvānjambhayansarvāśca

Weber   has          sarvāñjambhayantsarvāśca

Satvalekar and Agase have  sarvān where Weber has sarvāñ
Weber and Satvalekar have jambhayant where Agase has  jambhayan

Is this a case of misprints in one or more editions or some kind of case of
normalizing sandhi?
Which is the correct reading?

Thanks,
Harry Spier


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20170110/f1b82728/attachment.htm>