Dear list members,
Three editions of the Taitttiriya Samhita, the edition of Weber, the edition of Satvalekar, and the edition of Kasinatha Agase differ in a reading.
In the Taittiriya Samhita 4.5.1 verse 2
D
Satvalekar has sarvān jambhayantsarvāśca
Agase
has sarvānjambhayansarvāśca
Weber
has sarvāñjambhayantsarvāśca
Satvalekar and Agase have
sarvān where Weber has sarvāñ
Weber and Satvalekar have jambhayant where Agase has
jambhayan
Is this a case of misprints in one or more editions or some kind of case of normalizing sandhi?
Which is the correct reading?
Thanks,
Harry Spier