[INDOLOGY] Catushpitha Tantra vs Hevajra Tantra
mkapstei at uchicago.edu
Mon Jan 9 13:56:28 UTC 2017
Peter Daniel Szanto and Kazuhiro Kawasaki have both published on the CatuSpIThatantra. And I have noted
a reference to it in a 10th c. Dunhuang document discussed in my article "New Light on an Old Friend."
As for Hevajra, I believe that 7th-8th c. is too early.
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes
Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies,
The University of Chicago
From: INDOLOGY [indology-bounces at list.indology.info] on behalf of Paolo Eugenio Rosati [paoloe.rosati at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 7:38 AM
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Catushpitha Tantra vs Hevajra Tantra
I am struggling with the "chronology" regarding the catushpithas concept and its first appearance in the Vajrayana cosmos.
Particularly, the Catushpitha Tantra described a list of four pithas linked to philosophical concepts---atman pitha, para pitha, yoga pitha and guhya pitha (cit.
in D.C. Sircar [The Shakta Pithas] 1948, 11).
Regarding this text, the only clue that I found is that one of its commentaries was copied in 1145 CE (ibid.).
While I found no discussion about the original text, and particularly if it was previous or coeval with the Hevajra Tantra (that could be date between seventh and middle of eighth centuries)---althoug from Sircar study I argued he considered the two tantras to be more or less coeval.
I wish someone can help me with some reference to the Catushpitha Tantra.
Paolo E. Rosati
PhD candidate in "Civilizations of Asia and Africa"
South Asia Section
Dep. Italian Institute of Oriental Studies/ISO
'Sapienza' University of Rome
paoloe.rosati at uniroma1.it<mailto:paoloe.rosati at uniroma1.it>
paoloe.rosati at gmail.com<mailto:paoloe.rosati at gmail.com>
Mobile: (+39) 338 73 83 472
More information about the INDOLOGY