[INDOLOGY] 'Vedic' astrology
Martin Gansten
martin.gansten at pbhome.se
Wed Nov 16 08:47:00 UTC 2016
Bill,
I have read and re-read that section, and searched for various phrases
within the book as a whole (searchable PDF files are a boon), but I
can't find any mention of 'Vedic astrology' or anything like it. Dikshit
seems to have a western academic understanding of 'Vedic' as a
historical period, and he claims that the 'seeds' of a predictive system
are present in Atharvajyotiṣa, but he is also very clear that such a
system is not the one based on the twelve-sign zodiac, although he
thinks it 'probable' that the latter system, when it was imported into
India, was influenced by the parallel, indigenous system. (Which
undoubtedly it was, if perhaps not to the extent that Dikshit would have
liked to think. The nakṣatras are used in horā, after all.) This is
stated at the beginning of p. 100.
In my view this is quite different from the development that we have
seen over the past few decades, where practitioners themselves label all
Indian astrology (often including the Tājika school) as 'Vedic',
typically without any idea of that label referring to a particular
historical period -- if it is used in any historical sense, it is with
reference to a vague, mythical past. 'Vedic' is used here simply in the
sense of 'traditional Indian', the implied idea being a tradition that
is not only ancient and unbroken, but essentially unchanged (and, as
Robert has pointed out, sanctioned by Brahmanic authority).
Jean-Michel's mention of so-called Vedic mathematics in this context
seems very relevant; does anyone know when that designation first
appears? Also, of course, Dagmar's reference to āyurveda, though I don't
think anyone has yet decided to call that system 'Vedic medicine' (or
have they?).
Martin
Den 2016-11-15 kl. 21:45, skrev Bill Mak:
> Martin, not exactly. This was precisely my point. Dikshit did refer to horoscopy under Vedic astrology. See “Jātaka branch of astrology” under “Atharva jyotiṣa” in the section Vedaṅga (Vol.1 p.97-98). Things might have come to the forefront in recent time, but such ideas have certainly been around.
>
> Bill
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list