[INDOLOGY] 'Vedic' astrology (was: bhakti)

Mon Nov 14 15:58:35 UTC 2016

> Such experiences only strengthen my belief that there is nothing 'Vedic'
at all about 'Vedic astrology' except the conventional religious window
dressing by certain brahmin astrologers.

Robert, today, what is being called as 'Vedic' astrology in the English
knowing circles is not practiced only by Brahmins. Whatever dressing or
cosmetics is being done is being done by the western circles of the
practice and the English tag 'Vedic' is needed by them and is used by them.
Brahmin and non-Brahmin contemporary  busy practitioners do not even need
this English word or its Indian language forms such as Vaidik or Vaidika.

You mentioned a Jaina practitioner and her appearance on TV. Here, we have
Muslim practitioners appearing/advertising on TV. There are tribal
practitioners claiming authentic tribal jyotishya. None of the Brahmin or
non-Brahmin practitioners appearing on TV or the  TV people themselves use
the words such as 'Vedic' 'Vaidik' or 'Vaidika'.

Such belief systems and their believers do not need any such
tags. Satisfaction of knowing the destiny and handling it is all that
isimportant. Not whether it is Jaina, Muslim or Tribal , Tantric, or
whatever.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Bill Mak <bill.m.mak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Without examining the actual content of “Vedic astrology", I believe this
> discussion may become completely misguided. If one talks about the lunar
> astrology “hinted at” in the *Vedāṅgajyotiṣa, *indeed Vedic astrology
> seems the correct term. From the extant materials, this form of Vedic
> astrology based on 27/28 nakṣatra-s was practiced by the Buddhists and
> Jains. By the time of Varāhamihira, only remnants survived as collected in
> the *Bṛhatsaṃhitā*.
>
> As far as I can tell, what is referred to “Vedic astrology” refers
> actually to Greco-Indian horoscopy. Not only does it have little in common
> with the older “Vedic astrology”, the way it was conceptualized was
> completely different - it is based on solar motion, using zodiac, planets
> and planetary relation, concepts which are absent and foreign in the Vedic
> corpus. Unless one stretches the definition of Vedic to cover everything
> under the Indian civilization, “Vedic astrology” as such is a pure
> misnomer. No scholars on *jyotiṣa* would commit such travesty, from Kane,
> PV Sarma to Pingree.
>
> Best,
>
> Bill Mak
>
> --
> Bill M. Mak, PhD
>
> Visiting research scholar
> Institute for the Study of the Ancient World (ISAW)
> New York University
> 15 East 84th Street
> New York, NY 10028
> US
>
> Associate Professor
> Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University
> Yoshidahonmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan 606-8501
> 〒606-8501 京都市左京区吉田本町
> 京都大学人文科学研究所
>
> email: mak at zinbun.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> Tel:+81-75-753-6961
> Fax:+81-75-753-6903
>
> copies of my publications may be found at:
> http://www.billmak.com
>
> On Nov 13, 2016, at 2:11 PM, Robert Zydenbos <zydenbos at uni-muenchen.de>
> wrote:
>
> patrick mccartney wrote:
>
> I guess the question for me specifically regarding Vedic astrology is
> exactly the point Valerie and Luis raise. It could be called by the
> astrologers 'Indian Astrology', and perhaps it is a better representation,
> however they have settled on the use of Vedic to qualify their predictive
> system. Although, it's possible that someone out there might think that
> 'South Asian astrology' is a better term because all this knowledge
> developed prior to the birth of the Indian nation.
>
>
> If we ask such questions, there is the real danger that we enter the field
> of endless 'politically correct' quarrels. (E.g., is it not Western hybris
> to use the word 'Indian' for ancient Bhāratīya knowledge systems? etc. etc.)
>
> As for 'Vedic' astrology vis-à-vis other systems of astrology: there are
> also plenty of Jaina astrological practitioners (one of them has / had a
> regular program on a commercial South Indian TV station), there is a long
> and serious tradition of writing on astrological subjects by Jaina authors,
> and systemically I do not see any major differences with 'Vedic' astrology.
>
> The only significant difference I have come across concerns methods of
> prāyaścitta. I once heard a Jaina astrologer in Karnataka advise a person
> to pray to 'Infant Jesus' to counteract a certain planet's influence. The
> next person happened to have the same difficult, and she said "he should
> pray to Infant Jesus, but since you re a Jaina, you should do japa of this
> mantra to Munisuvratasvāmi". Brahmins, so she said, would have to do a pūjā
> to Viṣṇu.
>
> Intrigued by these bits of advice, I asked the astrologer more about how
> this works. She said that ultimately the worship of all those beings
> (Infant Jesus, Munisuvrata, Viṣṇu) produced the same effect, but only if
> the worshipper had real faith in what s/he was doing. Hence the object of
> worship needed to be chosen accordingly.
>
> Such experiences only strengthen my belief that there is nothing 'Vedic'
> at all about 'Vedic astrology' except the conventional religious window
> dressing by certain brahmin astrologers.
>
> RZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
> committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
> unsubscribe)
>

-- 
Nagaraj Paturi

Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.

Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies

FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,

(Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20161114/fd483add/attachment.htm>