[INDOLOGY] Eras and Dates

[Nityanand Misra]

Thanks, I did not realize the text had māha- in place of mahā-.

‘mahārāja’ is an –a stem due to ‘rājā’hassakhibhyaṣṭac’ (5.4.91), which
carries over ‘tatpuruṣa’ from ‘tatpuruṣasyāṅguleḥ saṃkhyā'vyayādeḥ’
(5.4.86). The rule ‘nastaddhite’ (6.4.144) accounts for elision of ‘n’ in
mahārājan + [ṭ]a[c].
On May 24, 2016 6:57 AM, "Ashok Aklujkar" <ashok.aklujkar at gmail.com> wrote:

> Probably “mā” in the place of “ma” in the second half of the first word.
>
> a.a.
>
>
> On May 23, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Nityanand Misra <nmisra at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 May 2016 at 01:44, Manu Francis <manufrancis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> siṃhavarmma-māhārājasya [sic] vijayasaṃvatsare ekādaśe pauṣyamāse
>> kṛṣṇapakṣe daśamyām mayā dattā tāṃpra [sic] paṭṭikā.
>>
>
> What is wrong with *siṃhavarmma-māhārājasya*?
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20160524/6bd6ea09/attachment.htm>