[INDOLOGY] by chance, accidentally
Christophe Vielle
christophe.vielle at uclouvain.be
Tue May 17 08:08:44 UTC 2016
#2 reminds me of the
kākatālīya-nyāya
See JACOB George. A handful of popular maxims current in Sanskrit literature (Part 1), 1907, p. 17
https://archive.org/stream/handfulofpopular01jacoiala#page/16/mode/2up
also Apte Pract. Dict. Appendix on maxims p. 58
Best wishes,
Christophe Vielle
Le 17 mai 2016 à 05:33, Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 1. something, some event, that happened accidentally, by pure chance - but, finally, had the power to influence the development of the Indian Civilization (in the spheres of thought, religion, social relations, etc.)?
>
> and
>
> 2. Status of "(pure, sheer) chance" in Indian thought?
>
> are entirely two different things.
>
> #1 seems to be a question on Indian history, #2 on Indian thought.
>
> Prof. Resnick brought yet another issue: 3. the aspect of pure chance in ancient Sanskrit narratives.
>
> #2 & #3 could be considered as connected.
>
> #1 need not be connected to #2 & #3.
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Howard Resnick <hr at ivs.edu> wrote:
> Interesting question. In the Maha-bharata, for example, human effort — purusha-kAra — is contrasted with daiva — providence/divine intervention or will. In Bhagavad-gita 9.10, we find the statement that “Prakrti begets…by my supervision/oversight (adhy-aksha)." In the Gita 13.21, and elsewhere, we find a two part concept of causality that matches the twin ontology of body and soul. Not to speak of the philosophical implications of karma.
>
> These are well known approaches to causality.
>
> I am also curious to know to what extent Indian tradition has considered pure chance, sometimes called yadRcchA, or adverbially akasmAt, to be a legitimate cause of events or conditions in this world.
>
> Howard
>
>
>> On May 16, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Artur Karp <karp at uw.edu.pl> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues.
>>
>> one more question.
>>
>> Do you know of something, some event, that happened accidentally, by pure chance - but, finally, had the power to influence the development of the Indian Civilization (in the spheres of thought, religion, social relations, etc.)?
>>
>> Status of "(pure, sheer) chance" in Indian thought?
>>
>> Artur Karp
>>
>> Poland
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
>
>
>
> --
> Nagaraj Paturi
>
> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>
> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>
> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of Liberal Education,
>
> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INDOLOGY mailing list
> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing committee)
> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or unsubscribe)
–––––––––––––––––––
Christophe Vielle
Louvain-la-Neuve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20160517/e9d62ebd/attachment.htm>
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list