[INDOLOGY] A grammar question

[Harry Spier]

Thank you to evryone who replied both on and off the list .

Harry Spier

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Nagaraj Paturi <nagarajpaturi at gmail.com>
wrote:

> द्विष is the verb root. वि-is the prefix. This gives rise to the new verb
> root विद्विष .
>
> द्वेष is the nominalization derived from द्विष . विद्वेष is the
> nominalization derived from  विद्विष
>
> This is similar to विश ,प्रविश, प्रवेश .
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Harry Spier <hspier.muktabodha at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> Apologies if this is an elementary question.
>>
>> In the Shanti mantra taken from the Taittiriya Upanishad
>>
>> saha nāvavatu saha nau bhunaktu saha vīryaṁ karavāvahai tejasvi
>> nāvadhītam astu mā vidviṣāvahai
>> Why is it  vidviṣāvahai and not  vidveṣāvahai similar to the form   dveṣāvahai
>> ?
>> I couldn't see it listed as an irregular form in MacDonnels grammar for
>> students or his Vedic grammar for students or Whitney.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harry Spier
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> INDOLOGY at list.indology.info
>> indology-owner at list.indology.info (messages to the list's managing
>> committee)
>> http://listinfo.indology.info (where you can change your list options or
>> unsubscribe)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nagaraj Paturi
>
> Hyderabad, Telangana, INDIA.
>
> Former Senior Professor of Cultural Studies
>
> FLAME School of Communication and FLAME School of  Liberal Education,
>
> (Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA )
>
>
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20160815/fe35ac75/attachment.htm>