[INDOLOGY] vizeSa as 'special rule'?

Martin Gansten martin.gansten at pbhome.se
Fri Oct 9 12:48:10 UTC 2015

Thank you, John; that seems very relevant!


Den 2015-10-09 kl. 11:29, skrev John Nemec:
> While this is not entirely what is asked for it seems quite relevant:
> The paspa"sAhnika associates the pair sAmAnya--vi"se.sa respectively 
> with the utsarga (or general rule) and the apavAda (exceptional rule); 
> the latter is to be used in exception to the former (tasya 
> vi"se.se.nApavAdaH). See paspa"sAhnika (7) of PataJjali's MBh, p. 50, 
> column 2 and following of the Sastri and Kudala edition. It seems your 
> text might be using the term in question synonymously with apavAda.
> Please excuse any typos or the like--I write this from an iPhone on 
> the road...
> John Nemec

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20151009/5aaf33c6/attachment.htm>

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list