[INDOLOGY] Controversy over Indian Science Congress to include panel On Pushpaka Vimanas

palaniappa at aol.com palaniappa at aol.com
Mon Jan 19 13:35:40 UTC 2015

This op-ed may be of interest to some.



-----Original Message-----
From: dermot <dermot at grevatt.force9.co.uk>
To: indology <indology at list.indology.info>
Sent: Tue, Dec 30, 2014 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: [INDOLOGY] Controversy over Indian Science Congress to include panel On Pushpaka Vimanas

I've read these posts, and the websites they refer to, with some wry amusement, and much 

It distresses me not only that such hermeneutically crude interpretations of ancient Indian 
texts abound, from Dayananda Sarasvati to the present, but that the genuine scientific 
achievements of ancient India, in phonetics and grammar for instance, are ignored. They are 
insufficiently spectacular, and take too much explanation, to appeal to Modi and his admirers.

There seems to be a lack of understanding that science is not a set of techniques for making 
things work, nor a set of doctrines, but a set of methods -- including the replication of 
experiments. Part of the blame for this must be taken by the colonial education system, from 
Macaulay onwards, which promoted literary and historical study at the expense of science, 
which would have cost more if it had been pursued as it was in Europe. If only Rammohun 
Roy's demand for "a more liberal and enlightened system of instruction, embracing 
mathematics, natural philosophy [i.e. science], chemistry, anatomy, with other useful 
sciences" (letter to Lord Amherst, 1823) had prevailed, the number of internationally reputed 
Indian scientists would be far greater, and the relation between textual accounts and the 
phenomenal world would be better understood. 

Dermot Killingley

On 29 Dec 2014 at 7:33, Michael Witzel wrote:

> I would like to draw your attention to V. Raghavan's (separately
> published) paper (33 pp.)
> Yantras or Mechanical Contrivances in Ancient India. 
> Transaction no. 10 (2nd edition)
> The Indian Institute of Culture
> (6, North Public Square Road, Bangalore 4)
> 1956
> He also deals with "aerial vehicles" extensively, with text passages
> taken from Epic and Classical literature but also (importantly) from:
> * Mane´svara's Manasollasa (c. 1131 CE) and * Bhoja's
> ´Srgaramañjari and his Samaragaasutradhara.
> Extensive description of a light wood bird, with several fires heating
> mercury inside... 
> Amusingly, the texts often refer to the technical knowledge of ... the
> Yavana.
> Cheers!
> Michael
> On Dec 28, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
>     Here's a refutation of the Vaimanika arguments, by a group of
>     Indian scholars at the Indian Institute of Technology at
>     Bangalore, from 1974. PDF attached to this email.
>     H. S. Mukunda, S. M. Deshpande, H. R. Nagendra, A. Prabhu, S. P.
>     Govindaraju, "A Critical Sudy of the Work Vymanika Shastra" in
>     Scientific Opinion, 1974:5-12.
>     Best,
>     Dominik Wujastyk
>     <ACriticalStudyOfTheWorkVaimanikaShastra.pdf>_____________________
>     ____________ ______________ INDOLOGY mailing list
>     INDOLOGY at list.indology.info http://listinfo.indology.info
> ============
>     Michael Witzel
>     witzel at fas.harvard.edu
>     <www.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/mwpage.htm>
>     Wales Prof. of Sanskrit,
>     Dept. of South Asian Studies, Harvard University
>     1 Bow Street,
>     Cambridge MA 02138, USA
>     phone: 1- 617 - 495 3295, fax 617 - 496 8571;
>     direct line: 617- 496 2990

Dermot Killingley
9, Rectory Drive,
Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 1XT
Phone (0191) 285 8053

INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY at list.indology.info


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20150119/06aa4bf6/attachment.htm>

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list