[INDOLOGY] Fwd: [RISA-L LIST] Pulping Intellectual Freedom: Academics will not bow down to vigilantism

[Patrick Olivelle]

In case this was not posed on Indology. This is very encouraging.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: John Cort <cort at denison.edu>
> Subject: [RISA-L LIST] Pulping Intellectual Freedom: Academics will not bow down to vigilantism
> Date: February 12, 2014 10:49:31 AM CST
> To: RISA Academic Discussion List <risa-l at lists.sandiego.edu>
> Reply-To: +++RISA ACADEMIC DISCUSSION LIST+++ <risa-l at lists.sandiego.edu>
> 
> The following comes from colleagues  in India.
> John Cort
> 
> 
> Pulping Intellectual Freedom: Academics will not bow down to vigilantism
>  
> It is an abject shame that Penguin will pulp Prof. Wendy Doniger’s The Hindus: An Alternative History. That this decision was reached in a deal with the petitioners, with no consultation with the author compounds the folly.  Coming in the wake of Oxford University Press’ similar meek surrender by suspending publication of Paula Richman’s Many Ramayanas – though forced to revert its decision in the aftermath of a spirited protest by senior academics from across the world – and the Delhi University’s purging of A.K. Ramanujam’s essay, “Three Hundred Ramayanas”, this episode shows that mighty publishing houses and premier universities will crumble under the slightest attack on academic freedom. 
> 
>  
> Wendy Doniger writes on subjects long considered taboo by mainstream Indologists: animals, sex, violence – but her style of writing, full of wit and humor and storytelling, was beloved of many outside of academia. This has also turned her into an object of scorn and hatred among Hindutva groups, especially among the diaspora. The low level of attacks – from the egg thrown at her in London to distasteful speculation of her personal sexuality by a US-based Indian businessman, patron and poseur of Right wing Hindu Studies – has only exposed the shallowness of her critics.
> 
>  
> In 2003, Paul Courtright’s Ganesha: Lord of Obstacles, Lord of Beginnings was similarly attacked for its psychoanalytic approach. A petition by Hindu Students Council in the US demanded from the author an “unequivocal apology to the Hindus”, leading the publisher Motilal Banarsidas to swiftly withdraw the book with the promise that such a “lapse” would never occur again. The petition also insisted that Coutright re-write the passages which the petitioners found offensive and issue a revised version with clarifications.
> 
>  
> This demand that academic study of religion be directed by, and tailored for a community of believers, with an unlimited potential for ‘hurt’ is simply preposterous and thoroughly unacceptable.  Many of us – Historians, sociologists, Indologists – are engaged in scholarship on religion. Some of us are believers, some are not. Some of us study our own communities, many train their lenses on others.
> 
>  
> We believe that all scholarship is open to criticism – especially by those who claim to speak on behalf of the community, as insiders. Indeed, it would add to the richness of debate. However, threats, personal attacks, calls for censorship and recourse to perennially offended sentiments cannot be permitted to hold academic enquiry to ransom.
> 
>  
> As academics, we will robustly defend our right to work on themes of our choice with theoretical frameworks of our choosing.
> 
>  
> A.Ram Babu, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
> 
> Abhijit Kundu, Dept. of Sociology, Sri Venketeswara College, University of Delhi
> 
> Adil Mehdi, Dept. of English, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Adnan Farooqui, Dept. of Political Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi
> 
> Ahmed Sohaib, Centre for the Study of Comparative Religions, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Ambarien Alqadr, MCRC, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Amit Sengupta, Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Delhi
> 
> Brinda Bose, Department of English, University of Delhi
> 
> Dhrub Kumar Singh, Dept of History, Benaras Hindu University, Benaras
> 
> Faiz Ullah, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
> 
> Ghazala Jamil, Independent Researcher, Delhi
> 
> Ghazi Shahnawaz, Dept. of Psychology, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Harsh Dobhal, Sharada University, NOIDA
> 
> Jairus Banaji, SOAS, UK
> 
> Manisha Sethi, Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Delhi
> 
> Manoj Jena, Dept. of Sociology, JMI, Delhi
> 
> M.S. Bhatt, Dept. of Economics, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Mohan Rao, Centre for Social Medicine and Community Health, JNU, Delhi
> 
> Mona Das, Satywati College, University of Delhi
> 
> Nabanipa Bhattacharya, Dept. of Sociology, Sri Venketeswara College, University of Delhi
> 
> Rahul Govind, Dept. of History, University of Delhi
> 
> Rochelle Pinto, Dept. of English, University of Delhi
> 
> Sanghamitra Misra, Dept. of History, University of Delhi
> 
> Shohini Ghosh, MCRC, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Sucharita Sengupta, Dept. of Political Science, JMI, Delhi
> 
> Tabir Kalam, Dept of History, Benaras Hindu University, Benaras
> 
> Tanweer Fazal, Nelson Mandela Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution, JMI
> 
>  
> Released by Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association on 12th February 2014.
> 
> www.teacherssolidarity.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> John E. Cort
> Department of Religion
> Denison University
> Granville, OH  43023
> 740-587-6254 (o)
> cort at denison.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RISA-L mailing list
> RISA-L at lists.sandiego.edu
> https://lists.sandiego.edu/mailman/listinfo/risa-l



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20140212/9be29f95/attachment.htm>