dvi.sa.m dvi.sam

[Dominik Wujastyk]

Many thanks to George Cardona and Gary Tubb for their learned corrections
and clarifications on the "dviṣam dviṣam" issue.

Dominik

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <cardonagj at verizon.net>
Date: 23 June 2011 12:05
Subject: dvi.sa.m dvi.sam
To: wujastyk at gmail.com


 Dear Dominik, When you suggest taking dviṣaṁ dviṣam as an iterated gerund
with -am, I suppose you mean the type accounted for by Pāṇini's *ābhīkṣṇye
ṇamul ca* (3.4.22).  However, this would then be *dveṣaṁ dveṣam*, like *bhojaṁ
bhojam*.  I suggest that the phrase in your text has iteration as accounted
for by *nityavīpsayoḥ* and means 'every single one who hates them'.
 Regards, George


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.indology.info/pipermail/indology/attachments/20110624/21d31b44/attachment.htm>