Re: Re: Sanskrit syntax problem: Double bind constructions
mkapstei at MIDWAY.UCHICAGO.EDU
Sun Mar 14 17:04:20 UTC 2004
But in fact this is not a very good example of the
phenomenon. sarvadharmANAm clearly is more closely
connected to AlayaH here.
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Somadeva Vasudeva wrote:
> In a message dated 14/3/04 4:03:40 pm, buescher at HUM.KU.DK writes:
> > *sarvabIjakaM vijJAnaM sarvadharmANAm AlayaH //
> > whereby sarvadharmANAm would also semantically be closely related to both
> > the preceding and the subsequent elements.
> You mean a zeugma? In Skt. this is called a diipaka and listed already in the
> Naa.tya"saastra as an ala"nkaara.
More information about the INDOLOGY