Re: Re: Sanskrit syntax problem: Double bind constructions

[Matthew Kapstein]

But in fact this is not a very good example of the
phenomenon. sarvadharmANAm clearly is more closely
connected to AlayaH here.

Matthew Kapstein

On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Somadeva Vasudeva wrote:

> In a message dated 14/3/04 4:03:40 pm, buescher at HUM.KU.DK writes:
>
>
> > *sarvabIjakaM vijJAnaM sarvadharmANAm AlayaH //
> > whereby sarvadharmANAm would also semantically be closely related to both
> > the preceding and the subsequent elements.
> >
>
> You mean a zeugma? In Skt. this is called a diipaka and listed already in the
> Naa.tya"saastra as   an ala"nkaara.
>
>
> SD.Vasudeva
>