INDOLOGY Digest - 10 May 1999 to 11 May 1999 (#1999-55)
Balaji Hebbar
bhebbar at EROLS.COM
Wed May 12 16:50:24 UTC 1999
Lakshmi Srinivas wrote:
"But the suggestion is quite plausible as vaDakalai's
tend to be concentrated mostly in the Northern
districts of Tamilnadu viz., North Arcot, South Arcot,
Chingleput etc.. Also, a majority of vaDakalai
families in Thanjavur and Pudukkottai districts seem
to have migrated in the last few centuries from
villages in the Kanchipuram area. The same, I think,
is true of vaDakalai Srivaishnava families in
Karnataka and Andhra."
Though this is generally true, one cannot be rigid on this
because the Tengalais have several "tirumaligai-s" (apostolic
seats) at KAnci and the VaDagalais have similarly some at
Srirangam. In fact the AnDavan MaTha (a major VaDagalai
sannyAsa pItha) is based in Srirangam.
Further, all KarnAtak Shri-VaiShNavas are not VaDagalais. The
KarnAtak Shri-VaiShNavas are of three sub-groups, i.e. the
Hemmiges, the HebbArs and the MaNDyams. The Hemmiges are all
VaDagalais. The MaNDyams are all STAUNCH Tengalais owing
allegience to the Yadugiri-YatirAja MaTha at MelukoTe. Most
HebbArs are VaDagalais with a small Tengalai group among them.
To answer Nanda Chandran's point:
The Shri-VaiShNava SampradAya is called Ubhaya-VedAnta for
precisely this reason that they accept as EQUALLY authoritative
the Sanskrit Vedas and the Tamil AzhvAr Prabandhams. Hence both
Tengalais and VaDagalais accept both. The question then is one
of EMPHASIS. The VaDagalais tend to lay emphasis on the
Sanskritic side, the VaDagalais on the Tamil side. All this of
course IN ADDITION TO the 18 theological differences between
them. We must remember that VedAnta Deshika (the VaDagalai
"Chief") also wrote in Tamil besides Sanskrit and Pillai
LokAcArya (the Tengalai "Chief") wrote in Sanskrit besides
Tamil. So it is clearly a question of EMPHASIS only.
Regards to all,
B.N.Hebbar
Adj Prof. of Eastern Rels
George Washington University
Washington DC
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list