Kashmir, Tamilnadu, Panini, Abhinavagupta, etc.

[Chandrasekaran, Periannan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Narayan S. Raja [mailto:raja at IFA.HAWAII.EDU]
> A site that Buddhists
> believed to be Potalaka
> (comparable in importance
> for Buddhists, to Kailasam or
> Vaikuntam for Hindus) is likely
> to have abundant archaeological/
> literary/historical evidence
> that it was an important
> Buddhist site.
>
By the same token,
I suppose one would expect Mount Kailash to be
abundant with arcaheological evidence of
Saivaite activity...?

chandra