DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
narayana at HD1.VSNL.NET.IN
Fri Oct 16 03:19:43 UTC 1998
A correction to my posting given below. It is the
uttaranRsimha-tApini upaniSad that describes the nature of"OM".
The error is regretted.
besides that the other two rAmatApini upaniSad and gopAla-tapini
upaniSad also have pUrva- and uttara- parts.
At 06:22 AM 10/16/98 +0500, I wrote:
>I think that nRsiMha-tApini UpaniSad is devided into two parts,
>pUrvanRsiMha-tApini upaniSad and uttaranRsimha-yApini upaniSad
>and the former is advaitic describing the nature of praNava (OM).
><<---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 15 Oct 98 14:09:14 PDT
>From: Jan Brzezinski <janbrz at microtec.net>
>Subject: gopAla-tApanI UpaniSad
>Does anybody have any knowledge of the tApanIyopaniSads (also tApanI
>upaniSads)? I have a number of commentaries to the GopAlatApanI, but other
>than the statement found therein that it was well known in Gujarat, I can
>find no information about this or the other works coming (apparently) from
>the same school (rAmatApanI, nRsiMghatApanI). They are obviously very late
>VaiSNava UpaniSads. Can anybody add to this meagre store of knowledge?
>Thanking you all in advance for your help,
More information about the INDOLOGY