upasargavazena dhaatvarthavipari.naamaat

[Madhav Deshpande]

> From the emails from Elliot Stern and Cardona, it is clear that the
corresponding verse in Kau.n.dabha.t.ta's works is not from Kumaarila.  We
do not yet know its source.  However, I noticed that the second edition of
Abhyankar and Shukla's Dictionary of Sanskrit Grammar cites this verse
under the word Upasarga with the reading that is found in the
Madhyaantavibhaaga.tiikaa, without citing a reference for it.  I doubt
that Abhyankar and Shukla are citing this verse from this Buddhist
commentary.  The verse probably has undergone some transformations, but
its history is not clear at the moment.
                                        Madhav Deshpande

On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Jae-sung Kim (Jung Won) wrote:

> Dear Indology Listmembers:
>
> Does anyone know another locations of following zloka,  especially the
> locations in the vyakaara.na literatures.
>
>         upasarge.na dhaatvartho balaad anyatra niiyate /
>         ga.ggaasalilamaadhurya.m saagare.na yathaambhasaa //
>
> I already know this zloka is in the  MadhyaantavibhaagaTikaa (Pandeya ed.
> p. 5).
>
> The context is following.
>
> [p.5]
> etir gatyartha.h / prati.h praaptyartha.h /upasargavazena dhaatvarthavipari.naamaat /
>
>         upasarge.na dhaatvartho balaad anyatra niiyate /
>         ga.ggaasalilamaadhurya.m saagare.na yathaambhasaa //
>
> pratiitya zabdo'tra lyabanta.h praaptaavapek.saayaa.m vartate /
> samutpuurva.h padi.h praadurbhaavaartha iti samutpaada.cabda.h praadurbhaave vartate /
>
>  Muulamadhyamakaarikaas (Madhyamikasuutras) de Naagaarjuna avec la  Prasannapadaa
>  Commentaire de Candrakiirti,  ed. by de la Valee Poussin,Bibliotheca  Buddhica 4.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>  $B!y!y!y (B
> KIM Jae-sung
> Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies
> University of Tokyo
> e-mail : jungwon at l.u-tokyo.ac.jp
>