Paired Horse and PIE breakup
naga_ganesan at HOTMAIL.COM
Wed Nov 4 14:05:52 UTC 1998
Well these latter examples are really relevant. Buddhism started in
India, but often is transmitted by non-Indians. For example, Chinese
were largely responisble for the spread of Buddhism in Japan. Tibetans
and Japanese have done the most to spread Buddhism in the United States.
So religion and technology are not language or "race" specific. They
skip from one language or ethnic group to another. Thus, attempting
to judge the breakup of PIE on the spread of horse rituals and/or
chariot technology is open to much criticism.
In the history of religions, buddist monks are the
first missionaries known to us. Many Indian monks
like Bodhidharma and Dharmagupta were in China spreading
Buddhism. Later their spiritual descendents took
from Sino-Korean region to Japan. Some Indians
could well have been there along with Chinese.
1) To teach Buddhist Sanskrit texts and 2)
Alphabetical order in one Japanese script
shows Indian influence (K. A. Nilakanta Sastri quotes a
1910s article saying it can be from Tamil; Southeast Asian scripts
derive from Pallava grantha). Japanese or Tibetan Buddhism is
recognizably different from the earlier Indian Buddhism.
This is in the last millennium. Why the horse ritual and
divine horse-twins myth are similar for a much greater time depth?
No evidence for such an effective horse complex evangelism
in second or third or seventh millennium B.C.
If we must rely on solely on archaeology
and textual materials are irrelevant and myths/legends
cannot be compared, IE studies won't be where it is.
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the INDOLOGY