SV: method of dating RV, III
SNS
sns at IX.NETCOM.COM
Tue Nov 3 14:59:29 UTC 1998
At 07:03 AM 11/3/98 GMT, Miguel Carrasquer Vidal wrote:
>
>Ah yes, I had completly forgotten about (Pre-)Bangani. That might
>indicate IE speakers at an even earlier date (Tocharians preceded
>Indo-Iranians into Central Asia). Has anybody ever tried to read the
>IVC script as Tocharian :-) ?
>
Lookup harapppa.com at http://www.harappa.com/script/danitext.html
For Dr. Agha Hassan Danis comments
SIVC An Agglutinative Language ?
On the other hand, I have been talking to Prof. Parpola that certainly
this is
an agglutinative language, there is no doubt. That has been accepted by
all of
us. Dravidian is an agglutinative language. But at the same time Altaic is an
agglutinative language, and certainly we know that there was a connection
beween Turkmenistan [in Central Asia] and this region. Turkmenistan is a
region where Altaic languages are spoken. Even in the pre-Indus period we
have a connection. In what we call the Kot Diji period, we have a connection
between Indus Civilization and excavations in Turkmenistan. So if we insist
on an agglutinative language being used inthe Indus period, why not connect
it with Altaic, rather than just with Dravidian? Why not connect it with
Sumerian, which is also an agglutinative language? In fact, when I was in
Korea, I found that their language is agglutinative, which I did not know
before. Just because of agglutinative language, it is not necessary that
it is
connected with Dravidian. But unfortunately, our history has been so written
in the time of the British that earlier we tried to trace out history from
the
Aryans, and we thought that before the Aryans were Dravidians, that was the
idea. So when the Indus Civilization was discovered, it was thought if it
is not
Aryan, it must be Dravidian, that was the general assumption. But it is not
necesssary.
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
* ? *
* *
*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list