Against Aryan Invasions

Samar Abbas abbas at IOPB.RES.IN
Fri Dec 4 20:41:12 UTC 1998

 Re. the recent debate on Aryan invasions, I think this is a good summary
of the points that are raised against the idea. It was posted by
Ved Acharya to Usenet.

   Author:   Ved Acharya
   Email: ved_acharya at    Date: 1998/12/04
   Forums: soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.tamil,
           sci.anthropology, alt.religion.hindu

                      AGAINST ARYAN INVASIONS

 The fallacious concept of Aryan Invasions is now wholly discarded by the
most sacred acharyas and sannyasis. These august persons have declared
that the Aryan invasion was a theory proposed by the crafty British who
wished to divide and rule. We have amassed a wealth of evidence in their

1. HORSE BONES - The horse bones found in the Indus cities were wrongly
claimed to belong to Aryan invaders. Instead they could equally well have
been due to large scale ashvamedhas (horse-sacrifices) by the pious Vedic
Aryans. Charred horse bones substantiate this view.

2. FRACTURED SKULLS - The fractured skulls that the biased Europeans said
were those of Dravidians slaughtered by invading Aryans were in fact the bones
of pious volunteers sacrificed during purushamedhas (Vedic human

3. THICH ASH LAYERS - The mischievious Europeans proposed that the thick
ash layers found in the Indus cities were due to Aryans burning down the
Dravidian Indus cities. In fact these could have well been the ashes of
the pious Vedic Aryan ladies performing sati and jauhar. Some fragments of
charred bones substantiate this fact, and many bangles have been found in
the IVC.

4. FALL OF THE INDUS - The Europeans have always claimed that the Indus
Valley civilization was destroyed by the nomad Ayrans. In fact, it was
destroyed by the Dravidians who invaded from the sea, and the Muslims, who
invaded from the north. Europeans have always tried to portray Islam as
a young religion, when in fact Abraham and all the Jews and Christians
were in fact Muslim. So Muslims existed in the centuries BC, and the
concept of Muslims having destroyed the Indus is confirmed by the numerous
temples (like the Rama mandir at Ayodhya ) being destroyed by Muslims.
References to Yavana invasions in the sacred Poorans also confirm this

5. SUDROID RACE - The Imperialist scholars tried to propagate the notion
of the Sudroid race to divide the Hindus. These were supposed to be the
black aboriginals enslaved by the Aryans. This is all falsehood, as will
be shown point-by point below:

  - The sage Vivekanada has declared that this theory is false. So how can
    it be right ?
  - Some Dravida chauvinists claim that Dravidian is older than Sanskrit.
    These are deluded, since these languages have no independant history;
    they are merely degraded forms of Sanskrit. The recent `purification'
    of Tamil by the removal of Sanskrit words is merely delusion spread by
    the Europeans. Both shall be reborn as cockroaches in their next life.
  - Moreover, the sacred Poorans declare that the Dravidians are
    degraded Kshatriyas, and so they are the Aryans. The Sudras were
    created from the foot of Brahma. Since this could have happened when
    Brahma stood in a puddle of mud, the Sudras became black.
    Unfortunately the Europeans do not accept the Vedas as anthropological
    texts, and so the holy Panditas have given anthropological revelations
    to convince the European mlecchas (barbarians).
    Thus, the Sudras stayed in the sun, and so got black skin.
    They took to eating pan leaf, so they developed thick lips.
    They were employed as hunters, and so they
    had to develop broad noses to smell better. Thus the concept of a
    Sudra race is wrong.

SUDROID NEGROES - Another concept propagated by the African nationalists
is the concept of the Sudras being Negroes, who built up the Indus Valley
civilization. These Sudric Negroes were then enslaved by the white Aryans,
just as Bantu Negroes were enslaved by the Anglo-Saxons. They do not
realize that they are all Indian, and are hence all Aryans. The
Sudras became the Sudanese, and the Gonds became the Kongos (whence Congo
river). Thus the Negroes are all Indian, just as the Anglo-Saxons are.

As shown above
the Sudroids degraded from Aryans, and these Sudroids then invaded Africa,
giving rise to the Negroes. This is proven by the fact that the genetic
differences between Aryan and non-Aryan are very small.

EVOLUTION - The theory of evolution of man from monkeys as proposed by
Darwin is completely false. The acharyas have declared that the notion of
holy Brahmanas being descended from monkeys was merely proposed to cast a
slur on the Brahmans and to insult Hinduism. When the sacred revealed
scriptures of Vedas and Mahabharat declare that the Brahmanas were created
from the head of Brahma, how can anything else be true? But Darwin's false
theory was jumped upon by the European scholars to prove their Aryan
invasion theory.

OUT OF AFRICA - The African nationalists have propagated the false notion
of all humans having come out of Africa. This was seized upon by the
propagators of the Aryan invasion theory, who claimed that since the
Aryans evolved from Negroes of Africa, they could not have originated in
India, and must have invaded from Africa. This sinister conspiracy has now
gained wide acceptance by anthropologists.

Another fiction spread by the Christian scholars is that the Vedas date to
1500 BC. This was because they could not comprehend any date before 3000
BC, when the Bible says the world was created by God in 7 days. So when
they read of dates and eras millions of years old, they dismissed it as
nonsense. But now it is accepted that the world existed before 3000 BC. In
fact, the Vedas are millions of years old, having been in existence from
the time of creation of the world itself in the yugas.

 Another lie propagated by the Europeans is that the Germans were the
purest Aryans. This is evidently not so, since they speak a highly
degraded form of Sanskrit and not the original pure devabhasha. Moreover
the Aryans in India have black hair, which due to snow falling on it
became bleached in the north. So they are not the original Aryans.

 Another myth propagated by the Europeans is that Shiva was a Dravidian
god. They cite the occurrence of obscene sculptures in the walls of
temples as evidence that Shiva and many other ascpects of Hinduism were of
Dravidian origin. This has been shown to be false, and the sculptures were
made for the entertainment of the European visitors; hippies who came to
India in 100 BC. They are obviously not for the Aryans, who would never
tolerated such things in their sacred shrines. The discovery of some nude
mother-goddess figurines is also cited as evidence that the Indus people
were the aboriginals. In fact these were imported by the European hippies,
who brought their obscene sculptures to India. These hippies were the
Greeks, who brought their obscene Priapus cult (whence the phallic nature
of Shiva worship) and other vulgarities that corrupted the Aryans. As
evidence such sculptures are only found after the Greeks invasded India,
introducing decadent Western culture and proto-AIDS (ancient venereal
diseases) that killed the Aryas.

 The Europeans have indulged in hero-worship of the Greeks (Homer etc.)
and Latin poets. They have also eulogized Shakespeare as `the greatest
writer of all times'. These are all bogus claims, since it has been shown
that these works were in fact renditions of original Sanskrit texts. All
these langauges, Greek, Latin and English, are merely degraded forms of
Sanskrit. Also, their literature is almost wholly copies of Sanskrit
originals. Tnus, Aesop copied the Ocean of Story, Shakespeare copied the
Pancatantra etc. The Trojan War is only a local re-enactment of the
Mahabharat War. So these are merely the degraded Aryas. When the holy
SIndhu river dried up in 1500 BC, they migrated to different parts of the
world, preserving only faint memories of their origins.

So it is evident that the Arya invasion theory is wrong.


More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list