Science and beliefs (was: the gods)
bpj at netg.se
bpj at netg.se
Wed May 28 13:30:23 UTC 1997
>At 11:41 +0200 27/05/97, Mr B.Philip.Jonsson wrote:
> I agree completely. Using Eliade's definition of a religion as
>'founding the reality' it's clear the science is today a new sort of living
>religion, with cosmogony, origin of life, of mankind, gods (Energy,
>Entropy, &c.), sacred and hermetic language (mathematics), well-developped
>magic (technology, flying, far-talking, fireballs, &c.), necromancy (old
>movies, archeology), clerics (I'm one) with studies, initiation, hierarchy
>and heretics (I'm one too) and underlying philosophy (the concept of the
>world's modelisation by scientific theories is platonician). The science is
>apostolic (a subtle form of neo-coloialism) but, perhaps, the main today's
>problems come from his lack of an eschatology!
Exactly. Agree with all you say. Hawking has tried to supply an eschatology
as well, but hasn't been totally successful.
> I don't agree fully: translating a text is not just translating
>words, syntax and semantic but translating too the *pragmatic*.
Still it is the translators duty, irrespective of his own tenets, to convey
the pragmatics *of the author*. This means that the translator must be
familiar with the subject matter and with the cultural context, including
the beliefs and values of the author -- the more the better --, but it
doesn't mean that the translator *has to share* the culture, beliefs or
values of the author. Indeed it is not always possible: I may be a
co-religionist of Asanga's (for example), but the religion has evolved
since then, so _my_ Buddhism isn't exactly the same as his, nor is it
possible for me to actually partake of the reality in which he lived and
wrote.
>one). And if I recall right, muslim law prohibes the translation of Coran.
AFAIK it is permissible to translate the Qur'an, but a translation is not
authoritative in the sense that the Arabic original is -- I'm sure there
are otheras on this list who can give more certain and accurate answers,
though.
Philip
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list