bodhi- correction

Chris Hibbard/E. Stern chibbard at POBOX.UPENN.EDU
Wed Dec 3 14:30:44 UTC 1997

>Dear Mr. Gardner,
>Unfortunately, I am not very familiar with Vedic literature and language. But
>maybe it could be helpful to link bodhi in those cases to bhU (cf. for
>instance Whitney's Roots and Monier-Williams sub bhU; ) rather than to budh.
>Best wishes,
>Horst Lasic

MacDonell's (larger) *Vedic Grammar* cites bodhi' as a root aorist
imperative 2nd singular active of either bhuu or budh (#505 c and note 3 on
page 370).

Elliot M. Stern
552 South 48th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029

More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list