Borrowings
n.rao at rz.uni-sb.de
n.rao at rz.uni-sb.de
Sun May 12 12:42:27 UTC 1996
Whereas the Samskrit-connected studies might have infleunced the emergence
of linguistics, I am not sure whether the suggestion by LGoehler at aol.com
that linguistic turn in Philosophy can be traced back to Samskrit studies is
valid. The main source of the linguistic turn are the problems connected
with the logic and 'logical form'. There was a dissatisfaction with the the
19th century formulations of the domain of logic as that of 'laws of
thought' or 'judgement', 'inference' etc. That formulation, it was thought,
doesn't clearly demarcate the study of logic from that of studying
psychological processes. 'Proposition', 'implication' etc. were suggested in
place of 'judgement', 'inference' etc., and this suggestion appeared to
postulate a mysterious third realm other than the 'mental' and the
'physical' ones. The 'linguistic turn' was the result of discussions in the
process of efforts at avoiding an 'additional world of entities' as the
domain of study for logicians and philosophers.
The account by G. Ryle in the book edited by him, 'The Revolution in
Philosophy' is still basically what more recent authors too present in
connection with the 'linguistic turn' .
Though Saussure's model was a source of the French approaches of
'Structuralism' in Literary Studies and Social Science (perhaps through the
mediation of Levy Strauss), it was hardly a factor influencing the
'linguistic turn' as understood in Analytical Philosophy.
>
Narahari Rao
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. B. Narahari Rao, F.R. 5.1. Philosophie,
Unversitaet des Saarlandes,
Postfach 151150,
D-66041 Saarbruecken, Germany. (Tel: +49 681 302 2849)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list