PataJjali a form of ZeSa
P.Magnone at agora.stm.it
P.Magnone at agora.stm.it
Mon Mar 20 18:37:07 UTC 1995
Re my previous message:
>As for YS II,47, there indeed is a varia lectio ananta/aanantya; among
>the commentators reading ananta, Vaacaspatimizra, VijJaanabhikzu,
>Raghavaananda Sarasvatii, BhaavaagaNeza, NaagojiibhaTTa, Raamaananda and
>Sadaazivendra Sarasvatii refer this to ZeSa, but they are all later than
>KaiyaTa.
... they are all later than KaiyaTa except for Vaacaspati, of course. Sorry
for the oversight.
Paolo Magnone
Catholic University of Milan
p.magnone at agora.stm.it
..
--- MMMR v3.60unr
> From THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV 20 1995 Mar EST 14:28:14
Date: 20 Mar 1995 14:28:14 EST
Reply-To: THRASHER <THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV>
From: ALLEN W THRASHER <THRASHER at MAIL.LOC.GOV>
Subject: LOTUSES AND THE MOON
More on waterlilies and the moon: I went to the stacks and
looked through several books both horticultural and taxonomic on
waterlilies and lotuses, and there was plenty said about day
blooming versus night blooming ones, but nothing whatever about
any opening with the moon. All acquatic plants called water
lilies or lotuses are in one family, the Nymphaeaceae. There are
terrestrial plants called Lotus either in science or in
horticultural usage, but they are unrelated and do not look like
aquatic "lotuses." Another detail is that the nocturnal species
and hybrids in fact usually open at dusk and close in the
forenoon of the next day. The terms "waterlily" and "lotus" have
no scientific standing, but there is a tendency to apply the
former to American species and the latter to Old World ones.
Prof. Ingalls told me years ago there was a tendency to apply
"waterlily" to day blooming and "lotus" to night blooming ones,
but on the other hand the Sacred Lotus (Nelumbium) is never
called a water lily that I've noticed.
Allen Thrasher
thrasher at mail.loc.gov
More information about the INDOLOGY
mailing list