[INDOLOGY] kośa or koṣa?
pwyzlic at uni-bonn.de
Mon May 11 18:31:49 EDT 2020
> Am 11.05.2020 um 23:38 schrieb Dominik Wujastyk via INDOLOGY <indology at list.indology.info>:
> I always thought the first, with ś, was correct, and the second was just an orthographic error. Then I saw "-koṣa" on the title page of Ingalls's Subhāṣitaratnakoṣa <https://archive.org/details/ananthologyofsanskritprosepoetrysubhashitaratnakoshakosadanielingallsh.h.univers/page/n2/mode/2up>. He must have thought about this.
> So which is "right" and why?
In his Indian Lexicography Claus Vogel points to Amarakośa 3.3.221 (sometimes 3.3.222 in some editions) and the commentaries that seems to justify the spelling koṣa. See Vogel: Indian Lexicography (1st edition), p. 303, note 1 (at this moment I don’t have access to the 2nd edition).
Hope it helps,
Institut für Orient- und Asienwissenschaften
Brühler Straße 7
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the INDOLOGY