dbhattacharya200498 at YAHOO.COM
Mon Jun 21 02:21:00 EDT 2010
Many thanks, Dr. Pant!
Will you kindly inform if the following transliterations into DevnagarI have been correct?
--- On Sun, 20/6/10, Mahes Raj Pant <mahesrajpant at MSN.COM> wrote:
From: Mahes Raj Pant <mahesrajpant at MSN.COM>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Raala RaaDa
To: INDOLOGY at liverpool.ac.uk
Date: Sunday, 20 June, 2010, 4:04 PM
Dear Professor Goodall
The first inscription is completely in Sanskrit and reads the pertinent passage as such:
The second one is in two languages, viz. in Sanskrit, as usual, the mundane things in Newari. The portion that interests us is as follows:
putrash caarukaRaaDadeshajamahaadevasya naaraayaNah.
kshetram. geham adaat suraaryyana --vaasis.Thagotrodbhavah.
In the above line, one can dissolve the words in question as caaru karaaDa desha, if he knows that a country named KaraaDa exists. I took the ka between caaru and raaDa as a kan suffix to caaru thinking that it was used to fill the metre.
The language of both inscriptions are not so elegant, so to say.You might have already noticed in the lines I quoted from the first inscription the order of words in the compound is faulty.
Mahes Raj Pant
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
More information about the INDOLOGY