Carvakas and incest

Aditya, the Hindu Skeptic a018967t at BC.SEFLIN.ORG
Sat Apr 4 10:56:20 EST 1998


>(I am not particularly interested in the Carvakas per se -- but rather in
>the incest part of the whole thing.)


This just shows the extent to which ad hominem attacks were resorted in those
days too. In what way his being a product of incest would be of interest to
anyone?
Could Mr. Silk prove that he is not product of incest himself?



More information about the INDOLOGY mailing list