caṣahttps://nws.uzi.uni-halle.de/search?lang=en&utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=ca%E1%B9%A3a
Thanks Madhav,
That confirms what I suspected was happening here.
best,Matthew
Matthew T. KapsteinProfessor emeritusEcole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies EmeritusThe University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Sent from Proton Mail for iOS.
-------- Original Message --------
On Wednesday, 09/30/26 at 15:18 Madhav Deshpande <mmdesh@umich.edu> wrote:
Attestation or not, the word caṣaka is grammatically derived by adding the affix -ka to the base caṣa-. We have many other formations like this where the base by itself is not found in common use. For example, mūṣaka is common, but mūṣa by itself is not common.
Madhav M. DeshpandeProfessor Emeritus, Sanskrit and LinguisticsUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USASenior Fellow, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies
Adjunct Professor, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India
[Residence: Campbell, California, USA]
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 4:56 AM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Dear friends,
With thanks to those who corresponded with me about my puzzle, I have found an alternative solution, though one that involves another, perhaps lesser puzzle.
The syllable preceding ṣāstriṃśat in my text is ca, which I had taken to be a conjuction. But if we read caṣās triṃśat, "thirty caṣās," and take caṣa to be a contraction of caṣaka, then this would be mathematically appropriate in context (roughly, "thirty minutes in a half-hour"). However, I have not been able to find an attestation of caṣa for caṣaka. Has anyone seen this before?
many thanks,Matthew
Matthew T. KapsteinProfessor emeritusEcole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies EmeritusThe University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Wednesday, September 30th, 2026 at 11:04 AM, Matthew Kapstein <mattkapstein@proton.me> wrote:
Dear friends,
An astrological text I am studying contains the wordṣāstriṃśatwhich has me stumped. Perhaps it is a very odd way of representing 36, ṣaṭtriṃśatbut this strikes me as quite strange.The reading is confrimed, however, by all four manuscripts that I am consulting, although they often disagree about other matters.
I would welcome your learned suggestions.
thanks in advance,Matthew
Matthew T. KapsteinProfessor emeritusEcole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Numata Visiting Professor of Buddhist Studies EmeritusThe University of Chicago Divinity School
Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list INDOLOGY@list.indology.info https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology