Dear Alexsandar,

Unfortunately not! It will require some more time. It is a lengthy task, as it is a laborious and meticulous process that also requires us to systematically compare the Kashmiri version with the Vulgate.

Best wishes,

Lyne




Lyne Bansat-Boudon

Directeur d'études pour les Religions de l'Inde

Ecole pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses

Membre senior honoraire de l'Institut universitaire de France

De : Uskokov, Aleksandar <aleksandar.uskokov@yale.edu>
Envoyé : vendredi 22 août 2025 15:53
À : Lyne Bansat-Boudon <Lyne.Bansat-Boudon@ephe.psl.eu>; Matthew Kapstein <mattkapstein@proton.me>
Cc : Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Objet : Re: Mokṣopāya completed
 
Dear Lyne,

Thank you for sending this very interesting paper. Has the edition announced there been published?

Best,
Aleksandar 

Get Outlook for iOS
From: INDOLOGY <indology-bounces@list.indology.info> on behalf of Lyne Bansat-Boudon via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2025 9:21:45 AM
To: Matthew Kapstein <mattkapstein@proton.me>
Cc: Indology List <indology@list.indology.info>
Subject: [INDOLOGY] Mokṣopāya completed
 
Dear colleagues,
 
All thanks for this very interesting discussion. 
 
I would like to add another stone to the edifice of reasoning.

 In 2018, Judit Törzsök and I published a paper entitled "Abhinavagupta on the Kashmirian Gītā. Announcement of the First Critical Edition of the Gītārthasaṃgraha, with the Reconstruction of the Text of the Kashmirian Gītā [..] and a French translation of Both Texts", in Journal of Indian Philosophy (46.1: 31-64).
 
Its final section (an Appendix, in fact), p.50 ff., deals with the (?) Bhāskara (his identity, his place of origin, his philosophical persuasion, etc.) under consideration in the platform’s discussion.
 
 I attach the paper, hoping that our colleagues might find further information there, and perhaps new material for other conclusions.
 
Best wishes,
 
Lyne
 
NB: Some of you referred to Kato 2014. It happened that while preparing the J’s paper, I came through a first draft of Kato’s paper, and that I suggested a few emendations, mostly on the reasoning; see the printed Kato’s paper. It so happens that I had access to a first version of his paper and that I suggested some amendments, primarily concerning the reasoning.
 


Lyne Bansat-Boudon

Directeur d'études pour les Religions de l'Inde

Ecole pratique des hautes études, section des sciences religieuses

Membre senior honoraire de l'Institut universitaire de France