Dear Antonia,I would just note that the study itself does not discuss "when Europeans noticed that Sanskrit, Latin, and Greek were related". That is coming only from the alumni magazine article.Best wishes,BenOn Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:04 PM Antonia Ruppel via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:My take as someone who has not read the original study: I am cautious about this for several reasons.-- A person's genes do not tell you what language they're speaking.-- University alumni magazines love to talk up research from their institutions and make its results sound much more 'decisive' than they are.-- That they get wrong simple things like when Europeans noticed that Sanskrit, Latin and Greek were related by well over a century does not inspire confidence. (But hey, scientists don't need to read early 17th-c sources in Latin, right:-)?)That said, if further study of the Nature article corroborated these findings, I'd be more than delighted. I'm definitely going to take a look.--AntoniaOn Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 15:22, Howard Resnick via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:Dear Scholars,Is this study as final and definitive as the article claims? Thanks!Howard
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology