I meant to write:Jan Houben wrote:Historically, introductions to Sanskrit since the nineteenth century are rather characterized by gradually filtering out Sanskrit grammatical termsandHans Hock wrote:, as long as we don’t expect anything more than corresponding terms for case marking there should be no problemLooking at the table of contents to Apte's "Student's Guide to Sanskrit Composition (third edition 1890)" only western grammatical terms are used. Does that mean that the grammar of sanskrit sentences can be correctly described using western grammatical terms, but it's just that those western grammatical terms don't correspond to Indian grammatical terms for sanskrit.Link to the ninth edition (reprint of third edition?)Harry Spier
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
Jan E.M. Houben
Directeur d'Études, Professor of South Asian History and Philology
Sources et histoire de la tradition sanskrite
École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE, Paris Sciences et Lettres)
Sciences historiques et philologiques
Groupe de recherches en études indiennes (EA 2120)
johannes.houben [at] ephe.psl.eu