Yes, Yaśovijaya is terrifically important and not at all adequately studied. For what it’s worth, some brief and tentative remarks on his treatment of Yogācāra Buddhism may be found here. 

https://academia.edu/resource/work/10346557

Matthew

Sent from Proton Mail for iOS


On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:54, Marie-Hélène Gorisse <mhgorisse@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear James,

Thanks for your question! Indeed, most of the scholarship in Jain philosophy is focused on authors up to the 11th c.

Next to Malliṣeṇa, the only notable exceptions are:

. Yaśovijaya (1624-1686), whose work has received some attention (though not enough yet). See for example:

John Cort “In defense of icons in three languages. The iconophilic writings of Yasovijaya”

Jonardon Ganeri “Worlds in conflict. The cosmopolitan vision of Yasovijaya Gani”

K. K. Jain “Kāśī, Yaśovijaya and Jaina Institutes.”

Jeffery Long “Yaśovijaya’s view on yoga”

Yajneshwar Shastri “Adhyātmopaniṣadprakaraṇa of Yaśovijaya: A Study” in Traverses on Less Trodden Path of Indian Philosophy and Religion

. Guṇaratna (15th), notably his Tarkarahasyadīpikā

Lucas Den Boer “Cārvāka arguments against the existence of the soul”

Padmanabh Jaini, chapter 5 of Gender and salvation

. Vimaladāsa's Saptabhaṅgītaraṅgiṇī, 17th c.

S.C. Jain’s English translation

. Authors from the adhyātma movements. Here, I advise to start with:

Jérôme Petit’s “Absolute and conventional points of view in Jainism: a historical perspective”, that gives a clear development of the niścaya and vyavahāra naya in Banārasidās (1586-1643), Dyānatrāy (1676-1726), Paṇḍit Ṭoḍaramal (1720-1767) and Paṇḍit Daulatrām (1798-1866) up to Rājacandra.

Now, most of the authors from the adhyātma movements are treated in scholarship more focused on the development of the different Jain lineages, rather than on the philosophical aspects of their works.

In general, you also have wonderful scholarship in Jain studies on the development of the different lineages, on literary studies and on polemical texts of these periods. Each tackle some philosophical themes but again, this is not the primary focus. I am happy to give references on these if there is an interest!

Still, strictly philosophical treatises are yet to be investigated.

Let me take the opportunity of this email to say that much is still to be done also on earlier Jain authors. And there, new exciting scholarship is developed today, especially on Pūjyapāda, Akalaṅka, Haribhadra, Amṛtacandra and Hemacandra, so stay tuned!

The very best,

Marie-Hélène


--
Marie-Hélène Gorisse

Dharmanath Assistant Professor in Jain Studies
Department of Theology and Religion
University of Birmingham



Le ven. 16 août 2024 à 09:03, Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> a écrit :
Hi James,

The 13th c, Syādvādamañjarī of MalliSeNa, of which there are translations by Dhruva and by Thomas, immediately comes to mind. Jonardon Ganeri’s The Lost Age of Reason has some discussion of early modern Jain philosophers as well.

best,
Matthew

Sent from Proton Mail for iOS


On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 07:14, James Hegarty via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,

I am looking for secondary sources that explore Jain philosophy from 1000-1500 CE.

Can anyone advise me?

I have a wealth of material for the first millennium, and there looks to be a fair amount (in Jain Studies terms) for early modern and modern periods, but I have scant references (at the moment Dixit's Jain Ontology has some material) for the very period I am interested in!

WIth Thanks and Best Wishes,

James Hegarty
Cardiff University

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology