Dear Bob, Patrick, Philip, Jack, Brendan, and David,
I hope this finds you all very well.
As I mentioned in a post to the Indology list, I imagine that the interim provost at Harvard has other fish to fry just now, besides Indian pomfret. But what's happened with Murty appears to be quite disturbing, and a transparent inquiry seems essential. One rumor that reached me suggests that the donors may have had a role in all this, but one of the reasons for which a genuine inquiry is essential is so that the field is not soon awash in rumors. And above all, it would be good to see the project on its feet again in a fully credible fashion.
I don't really think that there is very much that those of us not directly involved can usefully do here. But one thing that did come to mind is to begin a write-in campaign to the Harvard provost's office, with the aim just of demonstrating that there are concerned parties who are watching what transpires. I would be pleased to draft a boilerplate call for a fully transparent inquiry, to circulate for those who might wish to submit such a message.
Before so doing, however, I wanted to ask your thoughts about whether this seems a useful gesture and, if so, what suggestions you might have for it. Brendan rightly emphasized that censure and accusation based on partial accounts must be avoided. Under the circumstances, it does seem to me that Harvard has an interest in clarifying just what's been going on.
In all events,
grateful for your thoughts,
Matthew
PS. I should just perhaps mention that my own interest, besides knowing almost everyone involved, is in part due to my having a proposal to the series in preparation, and that is now definitely on hold.
Matthew T. Kapstein
Professor emeritus
Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
Associate
The University of Chicago Divinity School