Dear Harry,

You might consult some of Paul Kiparsky's work on Lexical Phonology (e.g., “Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology” in Phonology Yearbook 2 [1985]: 85–138) and more recently in Stratal Optimality Theory (e.g., 
https://web.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/reduplication.pdf, which has some examples from Sanskrit, and https://web.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/taipei.2014.pdf). Basically: sandhi consists of a set of phonological constraints which apply at multiple levels of the language, including the level of the stem, the word, and the phrase.

Andrew

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:58 PM rajam via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:
Kindly pardon my ignorance. Please let us know how you define “grammar.” 

Thanks and regards,
rajam 


On Feb 22, 2024, at 7:02 AM, Harry Spier via INDOLOGY <indology@list.indology.info> wrote:

Dear list members,
I've wondered for a long time why sanskrit sandhi has any dependence on grammar and is not solely determined by preceding or following letters/sounds.

For example why should internal sandhi have any differences from external sandhi. As MacDonell says, "The most notable divergence from external sandhi is the unchangeableness of the final consonans of verbal and nominal stems before terminations beginning with vowels, semivowels and nasal

Or why should  ī ,ū or e when dual terminations (and only when dual terminations) remain unchanged before vowels.

In other words, in these cases why should grammar and not just adjacent sounds determine whether sandhi occurs.
Thanks,
Harry Spier

_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology


_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
INDOLOGY@list.indology.info
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology